In my zeal for taking on a more sustainable life, getting some land, and getting read for an uncertain future, I’ve bought myself some stuff. Books, tools, pots, pans, jars, yarn, needles, bike trailer, blankets, and all manner of other things.
But lately, I’ve been wondering if I’m suffering from an acute case of having versus doing.
In brief, having versus doing is the feeling that having a particular thing is, if not enough on its own, then certainly close to it. That having a canning kettle is, say, nine tenths of the way to be being an awesome canner. Or that getting your hands on knitting needles and yarn is almost the same thing as being able to knock of a sweater or mittens or socks in a few weeks.
In some cases, things are necessary. Kettles, jars, pots, pans, yarn, needs, and all these things are definitely handy, and they make their respective tasks a lot easier to do. But on their own, they don’t have a lot of use without the knowledge and the skill to go with them. And as with many other things done by hand, the skills are those that usually require practice, and that just don’t pop up overnight.
I’m acutely aware sometimes that as much as I may have at least some (but by no means all) of the things that I want, my skills aren’t really where I want them to be. I can cook a great meal, sure, but if we had to survive next year on my gardening skills, we’d be in trouble. I can knit a sweater (with a bit of swearing involved, admittedly), but a bike repair is completely out of my range of experience. There are many skills in which I am significantly lacking, and all the tools and supplies and books in the world just won’t get me there.
Almost certainly, I’m selling myself a bit short. No one is as good at second guessing me as…well, me. I’m adaptable and a quick study. I can cook, can, bike, run, hammer, saw, and do all kinds of other things that I’m sure I’ll forget about until I’m reminded that they’re needed. But at the same time, I know there’s a lot of knowledge that I should have, and some that I would like to have, that I just don’t.
The truth is, having the stuff isn’t enough.
In Western culture, I think sometimes we get seduced by the the idea that things will somehow magically and mystically change us. That by having something, we will be transformed – often with little to no effort – into something else. This is prevalent in advertising, of course, where things assure sexiness, intelligence, humor, and a good life. But I wonder if we’ve taken many of these hopes even into areas that advertising doesn’t cover.
This doesn’t mean that we don’t work, or don’t learn, or don’t get out there and do things. Of course we do. Having things doesn’t excuse us from activity, and there are plenty of skilled, hugely competent people who are amazing at what they do (if nothing else, I see a whole range of them every Friday at the market). But I find, for me anyway, that it’s also easy to slip into the mentality that having stuff gets me, say, 90 percent there, and the rest will just sort itself out, or come with time, or something equally unproductive in the here and now.
And so, it’s time to put my stuff to work. I have an apple butter recipe ready to go, and cranberries waiting to become jarred sauce. I have some lovely sock yarn that I’ve just started casting on, and a guide to bike maintenance ready to go. We’ll be trying a new recipe for dinner tonight filled with all kinds of the root vegetables that are plentiful in the winter in this region. Although it won’t happen just yet, I’ve been looking at quilting patterns that I might like to try.
Sure, it’s probably better to have the stuff than to not, but the point is to actually use it. Having is not actually doing, and it’s time to rectify that.